No AI summary available for this article.
Why It Matters
Conspiratorial discourse on social media is not always expressed through explicit claims or stable lexical markers.
Provenance
Discovered via ArXiv and published by ArXiv.
Key Claims
Original description
Conspiratorial discourse on social media is not always expressed through explicit claims or stable lexical markers. The same surface content may express endorsement, legitimate concerns, criticism, satire, or mockery. The main challenge is therefore not only recognizing conspiracy-related claims, but inferring the speaker's intent -- the utterance's illocutionary force. We argue that this can be achieved through the use of relevant social contexts and propose an agentic framework, equipped with a set of tools supporting social queries. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach on a unique da...
Discovered via ArXiv
Research papers and preprints from arXiv.
Publisher: arxiv.org
ID: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30250v1 · Indexed about 1 hour ago