No AI summary available for this article.
Why It Matters
Clinical LLM assistants must reason over multi-visit patient trajectories, yet whether the compact history representations used to scale them---retrieval, structured timelines, LLM summaries, agentic memory---preserve the longitudinal signal clinical reasoning needs has not been measured.
Provenance
Discovered via ArXiv and published by ArXiv.
Key Claims
Original description
Clinical LLM assistants must reason over multi-visit patient trajectories, yet whether the compact history representations used to scale them---retrieval, structured timelines, LLM summaries, agentic memory---preserve the longitudinal signal clinical reasoning needs has not been measured. We introduce ClinTraceBench: 385 MIMIC-IV-derived verified dialogues with event-ID provenance, a nine-task taxonomy (T1--T9), and L0--L4 deterministic + L5 human-audit validation (98.92\% agreement). We evaluate eight history representation strategies---a no-context floor, \textit{last-visit-only}, \textit{fu...
Discovered via ArXiv
Research papers and preprints from arXiv.
Publisher: arxiv.org
ID: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01111v1 · Indexed about 2 hours ago